Reasons to choose EasyShare M531
Released in 2010, EasyShare M531 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M531
vs Kodak Slice
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M53128 mm²
Slice- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M531 and Slice have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M531MetricSlice
14.5 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.4 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.96 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
50.95 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M531 and Slice have the same sensor area. The Slice has the lighter body. The EasyShare M531 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M531 and Slice were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Slice
Released in 2010, Slice has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.