CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare M530
vs Kodak EasyShare M575

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M530

Kodak / 2010

EasyShare M530

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M575

Kodak / 2010

EasyShare M575

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare M530
28 mm²
EasyShare M575
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare M530 and EasyShare M575 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare M530MetricEasyShare M575
12 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight152 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Rechargeable Battery KLIC-7006BatteryRechargeable Battery KLIC-7006

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare M530 and EasyShare M575 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M530 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M575 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M530 and EasyShare M575 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M530

Released in 2010, EasyShare M530 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M575

Released in 2010, EasyShare M575 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 152 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras