CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare M522
vs Kodak EasyShare Z5010

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M522

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare M522

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z5010

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare Z5010

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare M522
28 mm²
EasyShare Z5010
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare M522 and EasyShare Z5010 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare M522MetricEasyShare Z5010
14.2 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.42 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.9 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight175 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2 x AA batteries alkaline, lithium, or Ni-MH

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare M522 and EasyShare Z5010 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M522 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M522 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M522 and EasyShare Z5010 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M522

Released in 2011, EasyShare M522 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z5010

Released in 2011, EasyShare Z5010 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras