CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare M522
vs Kodak EasyShare M5370

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M522

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare M522

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M5370

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare M5370

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare M522
28 mm²
EasyShare M5370
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare M522 and EasyShare M5370 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare M522MetricEasyShare M5370
14.2 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.42 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
2 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
49.9 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight150 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion KLIC-7006 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare M522 and EasyShare M5370 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M522 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M5370 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M522 and EasyShare M5370 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M522

Released in 2011, EasyShare M522 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M5370

Released in 2011, EasyShare M5370 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras