Reasons to choose EasyShare M380
Released in 2009, EasyShare M380 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M380
vs Kodak EasyShare ZD15
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M38028 mm²
EasyShare ZD15- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M380 and EasyShare ZD15 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M380MetricEasyShare ZD15
10.2 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.79 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.84 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight220 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Rechargeable KLIC-7003 batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M380 and EasyShare ZD15 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M380 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M380 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M380 and EasyShare ZD15 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare ZD15
Released in 2009, EasyShare ZD15 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.