Reasons to choose EasyShare M380
Released in 2009, EasyShare M380 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M380
vs Kodak EasyShare M420
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M38028 mm²
EasyShare M420- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M380 and EasyShare M420 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M380MetricEasyShare M420
10.2 MPEffective pixels10.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.66 µm
2.79 µm²Pixel area2.76 µm²
35.84 MP/cm²Pixel density36.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight142 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Rechargeable KLIC-7003 batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M380 and EasyShare M420 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M380 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M420 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M380 and EasyShare M420 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M420
Released in 2009, EasyShare M420 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 142 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.