CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare M341
vs Kodak EasyShare Z915

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M341

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare M341

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare Z915

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare M341
28 mm²
EasyShare Z915
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare M341 and EasyShare Z915 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare M341MetricEasyShare Z915
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight220 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion KLIC-7003 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBattery2 x AA batteries (NiMH)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare M341 and EasyShare Z915 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M341 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M341 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M341 and EasyShare Z915 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M341

Released in 2009, EasyShare M341 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z915

Released in 2009, EasyShare Z915 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras