Reasons to choose EasyShare M341
Released in 2009, EasyShare M341 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M341
vs Kodak EasyShare Z1285
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M34142 mm²
EasyShare Z1285- Area ratio
- 1.46:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 45.9%
The EasyShare Z1285 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M341MetricEasyShare Z1285
12 MPEffective pixels12.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.44 × 5.58
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.85 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area3.43 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density29.15 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.65
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight161 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion KLIC-7003 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare Z1285 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare M341 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z1285 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M341 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare Z1285
Released in 2008, EasyShare Z1285 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 161 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.