CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare M340
vs Kodak EasyShare Z915

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M340

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare M340

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare Z915

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare M340
28 mm²
EasyShare Z915
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare M340 and EasyShare Z915 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare M340MetricEasyShare Z915
10.2 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.79 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.84 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight220 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Kodak KLIC-7001 Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2 x AA batteries (NiMH)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare M340 and EasyShare Z915 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M340 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M340 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M340 and EasyShare Z915 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M340

Released in 2009, EasyShare M340 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z915

Released in 2009, EasyShare Z915 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras