Reasons to choose EasyShare M340
Released in 2009, EasyShare M340 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M340
vs Kodak EasyShare M381
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M34028 mm²
EasyShare M381- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M340 and EasyShare M381 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M340MetricEasyShare M381
10.2 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.79 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
35.84 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight133 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Kodak KLIC-7001 Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion KLIC-7003 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M340 and EasyShare M381 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M340 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M381 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M340 and EasyShare M381 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M381
Released in 2009, EasyShare M381 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 133 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.