Reasons to choose EasyShare M1063
Released in 2008, EasyShare M1063 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M1063
vs Kodak EasyShare M320
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare M106325 mm²
EasyShare M320- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M1063 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M1063MetricEasyShare M320
10.3 MPEffective pixels9.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.55 µmPixel pitch1.64 µm
2.41 µm²Pixel area2.7 µm²
41.47 MP/cm²Pixel density37.04 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight155 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Kodak KLIC-7001 Lithium-Ion, Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable KLIC-7001 Battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M1063 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M1063 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M1063 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M320 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M320
Released in 2009, EasyShare M320 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.