Reasons to choose EasyShare M1033
Released in 2008, EasyShare M1033 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 166 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M1033
vs Kodak EasyShare V1253
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M103342 mm²
EasyShare V1253- Area ratio
- 1.46:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 45.9%
The EasyShare V1253 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M1033MetricEasyShare V1253
10.1 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.44 × 5.58
1.68 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
2.82 µm²Pixel area3.46 µm²
35.49 MP/cm²Pixel density28.91 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.65
—Maximum video—
166 gWeight155 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
Kodak KLIC-7004 Lithium-Ion, Li-ion batteryBatteryKodak KLIC-7004 Lithium-Ion, Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare V1253 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare V1253 has the lighter body. The EasyShare V1253 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M1033 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare V1253
Released in 2007, EasyShare V1253 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.