Reasons to choose EasyShare M1033
Released in 2008, EasyShare M1033 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 166 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M1033
vs Kodak EasyShare M380
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M103328 mm²
EasyShare M380- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M1033 and EasyShare M380 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M1033MetricEasyShare M380
10.1 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.68 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.82 µm²Pixel area2.79 µm²
35.49 MP/cm²Pixel density35.84 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
166 gWeight125 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Kodak KLIC-7004 Lithium-Ion, Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable KLIC-7003 battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M1033 and EasyShare M380 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M380 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M380 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M380 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M380
Released in 2009, EasyShare M380 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.