Reasons to choose EasyShare CX6230
Released in 2003, EasyShare CX6230 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare CX6230
vs Kodak EasyShare LS443
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare CX623021 mm²
EasyShare LS443- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The EasyShare CX6230 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare CX6230MetricEasyShare LS443
2 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.33 × 4
3.52 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
12.42 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
8.05 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight260 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryKodak Lithium-Ion, dock (included) Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare CX6230 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare CX6230 has the lighter body. The EasyShare LS443 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CX6230 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare LS443
Released in 2002, EasyShare LS443 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.