CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare CD93
vs Kodak EasyShare MD863

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD93

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD93

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare MD863

Kodak / 2008

EasyShare MD863

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
EasyShare CD93
25 mm²
EasyShare MD863
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare CD93 and EasyShare MD863 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare CD93MetricEasyShare MD863
9.5 MPEffective pixels8.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.62 µmPixel pitch1.74 µm
2.61 µm²Pixel area3.03 µm²
38.24 MP/cm²Pixel density33.01 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
137 gWeight125 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare CD93 and EasyShare MD863 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare MD863 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD93 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD93 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD93

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD93 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.5 MP effective resolution, and a 137 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare MD863

Released in 2008, EasyShare MD863 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras