CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare CD82
vs Kodak EasyShare Z950

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD82

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD82

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z950

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare Z950

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare CD82
28 mm²
EasyShare Z950
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare Z950 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare CD82MetricEasyShare Z950
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight223 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLithium-Ion KLIC-7003 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare Z950 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CD82 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare Z950 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare Z950 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD82

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD82 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z950

Released in 2009, EasyShare Z950 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 223 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras