Reasons to choose EasyShare CD82
Released in 2009, EasyShare CD82 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare CD82
vs Kodak EasyShare MX1063
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare CD8228 mm²
EasyShare MX1063- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare MX1063 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare CD82MetricEasyShare MX1063
12 MPEffective pixels10.6 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.62 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.62 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density38.23 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight125 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare MX1063 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare MX1063 have the same body weight. The EasyShare CD82 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD82 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare MX1063
Released in 2008, EasyShare MX1063 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.6 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.