CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare CD82
vs Kodak EasyShare MD81

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD82

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD82

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare MD81

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare MD81

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare CD82
28 mm²
EasyShare MD81
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare MD81 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare CD82MetricEasyShare MD81
12 MPEffective pixels12.4 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.5 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.24 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density44.73 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight133 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare MD81 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CD82 has the lighter body. The EasyShare MD81 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare MD81 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD82

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD82 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare MD81

Released in 2009, EasyShare MD81 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 133 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras