CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare CD82
vs Kodak EasyShare CD93

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD82

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD82

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD93

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD93

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare CD82
25 mm²
EasyShare CD93
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
11.6%

The EasyShare CD82 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EasyShare CD82MetricEasyShare CD93
12 MPEffective pixels9.5 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.62 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.61 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density38.24 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight137 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare CD82 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare CD82 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD82 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare CD93 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD82

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD82 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD93

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD93 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.5 MP effective resolution, and a 137 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras