CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare CD82
vs Kodak EasyShare CD90

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD82

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD82

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD90

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare CD82
28 mm²
EasyShare CD90
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare CD90 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare CD82MetricEasyShare CD90
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight129 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare CD90 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CD82 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare CD90 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare CD82 and EasyShare CD90 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD82

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD82 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD90

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 129 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras