CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare CD80
vs Kodak EasyShare Z915

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD80

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD80

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare Z915

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare CD80
28 mm²
EasyShare Z915
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare CD80 and EasyShare Z915 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare CD80MetricEasyShare Z915
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight220 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2 x AA batteries (NiMH)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare CD80 and EasyShare Z915 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CD80 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD80 and EasyShare Z915 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare CD80 and EasyShare Z915 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD80

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD80 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z915

Released in 2009, EasyShare Z915 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras