CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C913
vs Kodak EasyShare CD82

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C913

Kodak / 2008

EasyShare C913

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD82

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD82

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
EasyShare C913
28 mm²
EasyShare CD82
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
11.6%

The EasyShare CD82 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C913MetricEasyShare CD82
9.2 MPEffective pixels12 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.7 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
37.04 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
137 gWeight125 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
AA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)Battery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare CD82 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare CD82 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD82 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD82 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C913

Released in 2008, EasyShare C913 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 137 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD82

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD82 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras