CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C703
vs Kodak EasyShare M320

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C703

Kodak / 2007

EasyShare C703

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M320

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare M320

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
EasyShare C703
25 mm²
EasyShare M320
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare C703 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C703MetricEasyShare M320
7.4 MPEffective pixels9.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.83 µmPixel pitch1.64 µm
3.36 µm²Pixel area2.7 µm²
29.79 MP/cm²Pixel density37.04 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight155 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryRechargeable KLIC-7001 Battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare C703 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C703 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M320 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M320 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C703

Released in 2007, EasyShare C703 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.4 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M320

Released in 2009, EasyShare M320 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras