CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C310
vs Samsung Digimax 420

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C310

Kodak / 2005

EasyShare C310

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 420

Samsung / 2003

Digimax 420

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
EasyShare C310
38 mm²
Digimax 420
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare C310 and Digimax 420 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C310MetricDigimax 420
4 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch3.04 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area9.24 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density10.82 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
154 gWeight165 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare C310 and Digimax 420 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C310 has the lighter body. The Digimax 420 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C310

Released in 2005, EasyShare C310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 154 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 420

Released in 2003, Digimax 420 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 165 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras