Reasons to choose EasyShare C310
Released in 2005, EasyShare C310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 154 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C310
vs Samsung Digimax 360
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
EasyShare C31038 mm²
Digimax 360- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C310 and Digimax 360 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C310MetricDigimax 360
4 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch3.44 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area11.84 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density8.44 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
154 gWeight165 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C310 and Digimax 360 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C310 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C310 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Digimax 360
Released in 2003, Digimax 360 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 165 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.