CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C310
vs Pentax Optio 450

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C310

Kodak / 2005

EasyShare C310

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax Optio 450

Pentax / 2003

Optio 450

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
EasyShare C310
38 mm²
Optio 450
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare C310 and Optio 450 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C310MetricOptio 450
4 MPEffective pixels3.9 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch3.12 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area9.72 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density10.29 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
154 gWeight250 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare C310 and Optio 450 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C310 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C310 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C310

Released in 2005, EasyShare C310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 154 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optio 450

Released in 2003, Optio 450 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras