Reasons to choose EasyShare C310
Released in 2005, EasyShare C310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 154 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C310
vs Olympus FE-250
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
EasyShare C31038 mm²
FE-250- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C310 and FE-250 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C310MetricFE-250
4 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
154 gWeight115 g
Internal storageStoragexD Picture card
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C310 and FE-250 have the same sensor area. The FE-250 has the lighter body. The FE-250 has the higher effective resolution. The FE-250 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose FE-250
Released in 2007, FE-250 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.