Reasons to choose EasyShare C195
Released in 2010, EasyShare C195 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.5 MP effective resolution, and a 177 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C195
vs Kodak EasyShare M575
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C19528 mm²
EasyShare M575- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C195 and EasyShare M575 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C195MetricEasyShare M575
14.5 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.4 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.96 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
50.95 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
177 gWeight152 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryRechargeable Battery KLIC-7006
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C195 and EasyShare M575 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M575 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C195 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C195 and EasyShare M575 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M575
Released in 2010, EasyShare M575 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 152 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.