Reasons to choose EasyShare C195
Released in 2010, EasyShare C195 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.5 MP effective resolution, and a 177 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C195
vs Kodak EasyShare M531
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C19528 mm²
EasyShare M531- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C195 and EasyShare M531 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C195MetricEasyShare M531
14.5 MPEffective pixels14.5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.4 µmPixel pitch1.4 µm
1.96 µm²Pixel area1.96 µm²
50.95 MP/cm²Pixel density50.95 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
177 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C195 and EasyShare M531 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M531 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C195 and EasyShare M531 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare C195 and EasyShare M531 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M531
Released in 2010, EasyShare M531 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.