CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C183
vs Kodak EasyShare M531

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C183

Kodak / 2010

EasyShare C183

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M531

Kodak / 2010

EasyShare M531

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare C183
28 mm²
EasyShare M531
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare C183 and EasyShare M531 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C183MetricEasyShare M531
14.6 MPEffective pixels14.5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.4 µmPixel pitch1.4 µm
1.95 µm²Pixel area1.96 µm²
51.3 MP/cm²Pixel density50.95 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare C183 and EasyShare M531 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M531 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C183 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C183 and EasyShare M531 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C183

Released in 2010, EasyShare C183 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.6 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M531

Released in 2010, EasyShare M531 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras