Reasons to choose EasyShare C180
Released in 2009, EasyShare C180 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C180
vs Kodak EasyShare V1073
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C18046 mm²
EasyShare V1073- Area ratio
- 1.62:1
- Absolute difference
- 18 mm²
- Relative difference
- 62.5%
The EasyShare V1073 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C180MetricEasyShare V1073
10.6 MPEffective pixels11.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.85 × 5.89
1.64 µmPixel pitch2.04 µm
2.68 µm²Pixel area4.17 µm²
37.25 MP/cm²Pixel density24.01 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.41
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight188 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryKodak KLIC-7004 Lithium-Ion, Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare V1073 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare C180 has the lighter body. The EasyShare V1073 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C180 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare V1073
Released in 2008, EasyShare V1073 has about 46 mm² of sensor area, 11.1 MP effective resolution, and a 188 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.