CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C180
vs Kodak EasyShare C190

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C180

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare C180

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C190

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare C190

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare C180
28 mm²
EasyShare C190
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare C180 and EasyShare C190 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C180MetricEasyShare C190
10.6 MPEffective pixels12.7 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.5 µm
2.68 µm²Pixel area2.24 µm²
37.25 MP/cm²Pixel density44.63 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight129 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare C180 and EasyShare C190 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C180 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C190 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C180 and EasyShare C190 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C180

Released in 2009, EasyShare C180 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C190

Released in 2009, EasyShare C190 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.7 MP effective resolution, and a 129 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras