Reasons to choose EasyShare C160
Released in 2009, EasyShare C160 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C160
vs Kodak EasyShare M853
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare C16025 mm²
EasyShare M853- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare M853 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C160MetricEasyShare M853
9.2 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
2.7 µm²Pixel area3.07 µm²
37.04 MP/cm²Pixel density32.61 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryKodak Lithium-Ion, dock (optional) Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare M853 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C160 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C160 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C160 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M853
Released in 2007, EasyShare M853 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.