Reasons to choose EasyShare C160
Released in 2009, EasyShare C160 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C160
vs Kodak EasyShare CD93
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare C16025 mm²
EasyShare CD93- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare CD93 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C160MetricEasyShare CD93
9.2 MPEffective pixels9.5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.62 µm
2.7 µm²Pixel area2.61 µm²
37.04 MP/cm²Pixel density38.24 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight137 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare CD93 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C160 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD93 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare CD93 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare CD93
Released in 2009, EasyShare CD93 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.5 MP effective resolution, and a 137 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.