Reasons to choose EasyShare C1550
Released in 2011, EasyShare C1550 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.6 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C1550
vs Kodak EasyShare M532
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C155028 mm²
EasyShare M532- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C1550 and EasyShare M532 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C1550MetricEasyShare M532
16.6 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.71 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
58.33 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C1550 and EasyShare M532 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M532 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C1550 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C1550 and EasyShare M532 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M532
Released in 2011, EasyShare M532 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.