CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C1530
vs Kodak EasyShare M522

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C1530

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare C1530

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M522

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare M522

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare C1530
28 mm²
EasyShare M522
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare C1530 and EasyShare M522 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C1530MetricEasyShare M522
14.5 MPEffective pixels14.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.4 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
1.96 µm²Pixel area2 µm²
50.95 MP/cm²Pixel density49.9 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare C1530 and EasyShare M522 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M522 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C1530 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C1530 and EasyShare M522 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C1530

Released in 2011, EasyShare C1530 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.5 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M522

Released in 2011, EasyShare M522 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras