Reasons to choose EasyShare C1505
Released in 2011, EasyShare C1505 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C1505
vs Kodak EasyShare M532
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C150528 mm²
EasyShare M532- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C1505 and EasyShare M532 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C1505MetricEasyShare M532
12 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C1505 and EasyShare M532 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M532 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M532 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C1505 and EasyShare M532 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M532
Released in 2011, EasyShare M532 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.