CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare C142
vs Kodak EasyShare M550

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare C142

Kodak / 2010

EasyShare C142

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare M550

Kodak / 2010

EasyShare M550

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
EasyShare C142
28 mm²
EasyShare M550
Area ratio
1.15:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
14.6%

The EasyShare M550 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EasyShare C142MetricEasyShare M550
10.3 MPEffective pixels12.3 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.55 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.41 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
41.47 MP/cm²Pixel density43.22 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
170 gWeight125 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryRechargeable Battery KLIC-7006

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare M550 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare M550 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M550 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C142 and EasyShare M550 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare C142

Released in 2010, EasyShare C142 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare M550

Released in 2010, EasyShare M550 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.3 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras