Reasons to choose EasyShare C140
Released in 2009, EasyShare C140 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C140
vs Kodak EasyShare Z980
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare C14028 mm²
EasyShare Z980- Area ratio
- 1.12:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 11.6%
The EasyShare Z980 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C140MetricEasyShare Z980
8.2 MPEffective pixels12 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.74 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
3.03 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
33.01 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight415 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
AA (2) NiMH Rechargeable batteriesBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare Z980 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare C140 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z980 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C140 and EasyShare Z980 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare Z980
Released in 2009, EasyShare Z980 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 415 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.