Reasons to choose EasyShare C140
Released in 2009, EasyShare C140 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C140
vs Kodak EasyShare M320
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare C14025 mm²
EasyShare M320- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C140 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C140MetricEasyShare M320
8.2 MPEffective pixels9.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.74 µmPixel pitch1.64 µm
3.03 µm²Pixel area2.7 µm²
33.01 MP/cm²Pixel density37.04 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight155 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
AA (2) NiMH Rechargeable batteriesBatteryRechargeable KLIC-7001 Battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C140 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C140 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M320 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C140 and EasyShare M320 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M320
Released in 2009, EasyShare M320 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.