Reasons to choose EasyShare C135
Released in 2012, EasyShare C135 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C135
vs Kodak EasyShare M565
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C13528 mm²
EasyShare M565- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C135 and EasyShare M565 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C135MetricEasyShare M565
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorage—
2 x AA batteries alkaline, lithium, or Ni-MHBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C135 and EasyShare M565 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M565 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C135 and EasyShare M565 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare C135 and EasyShare M565 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M565
Released in 2012, EasyShare M565 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.