Reasons to choose EasyShare DX6490
Released in 2003, EasyShare DX6490 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 380 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare DX6490
vs Kodak EasyShare CX7525
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare DX649025 mm²
EasyShare CX7525- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare DX6490 and EasyShare CX7525 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare DX6490MetricEasyShare CX7525
4 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.49 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
6.21 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
16.1 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
380 gWeight192 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Kodak Lithium-Ion, dock (optional) Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare DX6490 and EasyShare CX7525 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CX7525 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CX7525 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CX7525 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare CX7525
Released in 2005, EasyShare CX7525 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 192 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.