Reasons to choose EasyShare DX6440
Released in 2003, EasyShare DX6440 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 270 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare DX6440
vs Kodak EasyShare CX4200
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare DX644021 mm²
EasyShare CX4200- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The EasyShare DX6440 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare DX6440MetricEasyShare CX4200
4 MPEffective pixels2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.33 × 4
2.49 µmPixel pitch3.26 µm
6.21 µm²Pixel area10.66 µm²
16.1 MP/cm²Pixel density9.38 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
270 gWeight240 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare DX6440 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare CX4200 has the lighter body. The EasyShare DX6440 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare DX6440 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare CX4200
Released in 2002, EasyShare CX4200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.