CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare DX6340
vs Rollei dk4010

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare DX6340

Kodak / 2003

EasyShare DX6340

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
EasyShare DX6340
21 mm²
dk4010
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare DX6340 and dk4010 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare DX6340Metricdk4010
3.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight350 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare DX6340 and dk4010 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare DX6340 has the lighter body. The dk4010 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare DX6340

Released in 2003, EasyShare DX6340 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras