Reasons to choose EasyShare DX3600
Released in 2001, EasyShare DX3600 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare DX3600
vs Kodak EasyShare LS420
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
EasyShare DX360038 mm²
EasyShare LS420- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The EasyShare LS420 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare DX3600MetricEasyShare LS420
2.2 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.74 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
13.96 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
7.16 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
250 gWeight160 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryKodak Lithium-Ion, dock Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare LS420 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare LS420 has the lighter body. The EasyShare DX3600 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare LS420 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare LS420
Released in 2002, EasyShare LS420 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.