CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DCS420
vs Olympus D-300L

Archive illustration for Kodak DCS420

Kodak / 1994

DCS420

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus D-300L

Olympus / 1996

D-300L

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

130 mm²
DCS420
58 mm²
D-300L
Area ratio
2.24:1
Absolute difference
72 mm²
Relative difference
124.2%

The DCS420 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DCS420MetricD-300L
1.5 MPEffective pixels0.8 MP
14 × 9.3Sensor8.8 × 6.6
9.32 µmPixel pitch8.52 µm
86.8 µm²Pixel area72.6 µm²
1.15 MP/cm²Pixel density1.38 MP/cm²
2.57Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
1,700 gWeight320 g
PCMCIA (type III)StorageInternal storage
Kodak NiMHBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCS420 has the larger sensor area. The D-300L has the lighter body. The DCS420 has the higher effective resolution. The D-300L is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCS420

Released in 1994, DCS420 has about 130 mm² of sensor area, 1.5 MP effective resolution, and a 1,700 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-300L

Released in 1996, D-300L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.8 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras