Reasons to choose DCS330
Released in 1999, DCS330 has about 244 mm² of sensor area, 3 MP effective resolution, and a 1,080 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DCS330
vs Kodak DCS660
VS
Sensor area
244 mm²
DCS330510 mm²
DCS660- Area ratio
- 2.09:1
- Absolute difference
- 265 mm²
- Relative difference
- 108.5%
The DCS660 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DCS330MetricDCS660
3 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
18.1 × 13.5Sensor27.65 × 18.43
9.02 µmPixel pitch9.14 µm
81.45 µm²Pixel area83.54 µm²
1.23 MP/cm²Pixel density1.2 MP/cm²
1.92Crop factor1.3
—Maximum video—
1,080 gWeight1,580 g
PCMCIA (type II or III)StoragePCMCIA (2 x type II / 1 x type III)
AA (6) batteries (Lithium / NiMH)BatteryKodak NiCD
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DCS660 has the larger sensor area. The DCS330 has the lighter body. The DCS660 has the higher effective resolution. The DCS330 and DCS660 were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCS660
Released in 1999, DCS660 has about 510 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,580 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.