CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DC3400
vs Kodak DC3800

Archive illustration for Kodak DC3400

Kodak / 2000

DC3400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak DC3800

Kodak / 2000

DC3800

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DC3400
42 mm²
DC3800
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC3400 and DC3800 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC3400MetricDC3800
2 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
4.61 µmPixel pitch4.61 µm
21.23 µm²Pixel area21.23 µm²
4.71 MP/cm²Pixel density4.71 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
332 gWeight205 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA NiMH (4) batteries includedBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC3400 and DC3800 have the same sensor area. The DC3800 has the lighter body. The DC3400 and DC3800 have the same effective resolution. The DC3400 and DC3800 were both released in 2000. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC3400

Released in 2000, DC3400 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 332 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC3800

Released in 2000, DC3800 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras