CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DC3200
vs Kodak DC5000

Archive illustration for Kodak DC3200

Kodak / 2000

DC3200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak DC5000

Kodak / 2000

DC5000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DC3200
40 mm²
DC5000
Area ratio
1.07:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
7%

The DC3200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC3200MetricDC5000
0.9 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.87 µmPixel pitch4.46 µm
47.19 µm²Pixel area19.85 µm²
2.12 MP/cm²Pixel density5.04 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
300 gWeight520 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC3200 has the larger sensor area. The DC3200 has the lighter body. The DC5000 has the higher effective resolution. The DC3200 and DC5000 were both released in 2000. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC3200

Released in 2000, DC3200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC5000

Released in 2000, DC5000 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 520 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras