Reasons to choose DC220
Released in 1998, DC220 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 550 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DC220
vs Kodak DC260
VS
Sensor area
40 mm²
DC22040 mm²
DC260- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC220 and DC260 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC220MetricDC260
0.9 MPEffective pixels1.5 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.64 µmPixel pitch5.14 µm
44.1 µm²Pixel area26.46 µm²
2.27 MP/cm²Pixel density3.78 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
550 gWeight550 g
Compact FlashStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC220 and DC260 have the same sensor area. The DC220 and DC260 have the same body weight. The DC260 has the higher effective resolution. The DC220 and DC260 were both released in 1998. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC260
Released in 1998, DC260 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 1.5 MP effective resolution, and a 550 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.